Gifted and Talented International, 17, 15–21.įarrell, J. Trends in research into gifted and talented education in England. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Įyre, D., & Geake, J. Subotnik (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. The child and society: The process of socialization. The Astor program for gifted children: Pre-Kindergarten through grade three.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University in cooperation with the Board of Education of the City of New York.Įlkin, F., & Handel, G. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–171.Įhrlich, V. Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 187–204.Įccles, J. The effects of time and direction: Changes on the SAT performance of academically talented adolescents. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex(Rev. 2.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.ĭarwin, C. Terman (Series Ed.), Genetic studies of genius, Vol. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Ĭox, C. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 322–336.Ĭorsaro, W. Gifted children: The impact of positive labeling on the family system. Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 353–375.Ĭolangelo, N., Assouline, S. Class consciousness and its consequences: The impact of an elite education on mature, working-class women. Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school(2nd ed.). Stanley (Eds.), Critical issues for diversity in gifted education(pp. Empowering and serving Hispanic students in gifted education. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Ĭastellano, J. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 284–311.Ĭarroll, J. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Ĭallahan, C. The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. Paper presented at the 1987 biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.Ĭallahan, C. Influences on strategies gifted adolescents use to cope with their own recognized talents. Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to the psychology and education of the gifted. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.īorland, J. A history of experimental psychology(2nd ed.). Application des methods nouvelle au diagnostic du niveau intellectual chez des enfants normaux et anormaux d’hospice et d’ecole primaire. Paris: Flammarion.īinet, A., et Simon, Th. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 118–130.īereiter, C. Something’s wrong here and it’ not me: Challenging the dilemmas that block girls’ success. Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. Perspectives on female talent development. Gifted and Talented International, 18, 95–100.Īrnold, K., Noble, K. Parental involvement in the schooling of children. (1969).Genius: Present-day status of the concept and its implications for the study of creativity and giftedness. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.Īlbert, R. The AAUW Report: How schools shortchange girls. This chapter discusses masculine and feminine conceptions, the development of gifted girls, and barriers for girls from culturally diverse and low socioeconomic circumstances. Internationally, the field still defines giftedness as the potential for eminence. Research for 100 years has demonstrated that there are at least as many gifted girls as boys–-even in the highest IQ ranges. In 1914, Leta Hollingworth completely discredited this hypothesis. The lack of eminent women has been attributed to Darwin’s variability hypothesis: since males are more variable than females, more males are assumed to be at the extremes of intelligence, whereas women tend toward the mean. Women, conomically disadvantaged, and culturally diverse groups do not have the same opportunities to attain eminence. The masculine perspective, the legacy of Francis Galton, equates giftedness with eminence. The feminine perspective, the legacy of Leta Hollingworth, focuses on developmental differences in childhood and equal pportunity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |